Flexsteel Industries vs Lovesac
FLXS and LOVE side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FLXS and LOVE compare
Flexsteel Industries is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as Lovesac ($301M against $236M).
On earnings, Flexsteel Industries is cheaper: it trades at 12.1× trailing earnings, against 13.5× for Lovesac.
Flexsteel Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.1% versus 1.1% for Lovesac).
Flexsteel Industries keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.2% compared with 2.6% at Lovesac.
Flexsteel Industries pays a dividend yielding 1.2%; Lovesac does not pay one.
Flexsteel Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (22 against 14 for Lovesac), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FLXS | LOVE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $301M | $236M |
| Share price | $73.64 | $16.33 |
| Change, 1 year | 111% | 14.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 155% | −79.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.78 | 2.15 |
| Employees | 1,200 | 917 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 22 (better) | 14 |
| Valuation score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.1× (better) | 13.5× |
| P/S | 0.7× | 0.3× (better) |
| P/B | 2.3× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.7× | 4.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 6.3× | 5.2× (better) |
| PEG | 0.40 | – |
| FCF yield | 15.8% | 19.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $90.39 | $26.07 |
| Margin of safety | 18.5% | 37.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.1% (better) | 1.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.84% | 16.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 64.4% (better) | 38.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 71.0% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 14.5% (better) | −21.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 24.7% | 58.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | 9.3% (better) | 3.3% |
| Net margin | 7.2% (better) | 2.6% |
| FCF margin | 10.4% (better) | 6.5% |
| Return on equity | 22.0% (better) | 8.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 26.3% (better) | 10.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 2.09 (better) | 1.47 |
| Altman Z-score | 5.46 (better) | 2.07 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.2% | – |
| Payout ratio | 13.2% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 13.6% | – |
| Buyback yield | −0.02% | 3.1% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 1.2% | 3.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 68.6% | 98.0% |
| Held by insiders | 14.3% | 14.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.9M | $423K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.8% | 26.0% |
Go deeper
- FLXS stock overview
- FLXS income statement
- FLXS valuation and score
- LOVE stock overview
- LOVE income statement
- LOVE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.