BingEx vs Quhuo
FLX and QH side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FLX and QH compare
BingEx grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−10.7% versus −17.1% for Quhuo).
BingEx keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 2.7% compared with −5.9% at Quhuo.
BingEx scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 2 for Quhuo), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FLX | QH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $1.40 | $2.97 |
| Change, 1 year | −59.4% | 251% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −100.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.89 | 3.70 |
| Employees | 807 | 474 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −10.7% (better) | −17.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | −0.43% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −5625% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −1200% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 11.8% (better) | 0.49% |
| Operating margin | 1.2% (better) | −7.0% |
| Net margin | 2.7% (better) | −5.9% |
| FCF margin | 2.5% (better) | −1.6% |
| Return on equity | 13.8% (better) | −36.5% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −29.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.32 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | −42.4× |
| Current ratio | 2.35 (better) | 1.03 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 3.2% | – |
| Held by insiders | 36.7% | 10.3% |
Go deeper
- FLX stock overview
- FLX income statement
- FLX valuation and score
- QH stock overview
- QH income statement
- QH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.