1 800 Flowers Com vs Titan Machinery
FLWS and TITN side by side, both in miscellaneous retail. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FLWS and TITN compare
Titan Machinery is the larger company, worth 3.3 times as much as 1 800 Flowers Com ($531M against $161M).
Titan Machinery grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−10.7% versus −10.8% for 1 800 Flowers Com).
Titan Machinery keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −2.5% compared with −9.3% at 1 800 Flowers Com.
Titan Machinery scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 3 for 1 800 Flowers Com), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FLWS | TITN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $161M | $531M |
| Share price | $2.51 | $22.57 |
| Change, 1 year | −21.6% | 36.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −92.6% | −33.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.48 | 1.20 |
| Employees | – | 3,114 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 0.2× |
| P/B | 1.7× | 1.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 23.9× |
| FCF yield | −3.9% | – |
| Fair value | $3.99 | $27.43 |
| Margin of safety | 37.1% (better) | 17.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −10.8% | −10.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −6.7% | 11.5% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 37.9% (better) | 16.5% |
| Operating margin | −8.4% | −0.41% (better) |
| Net margin | −9.3% | −2.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | −0.43% | – |
| Return on equity | −87.7% | −9.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −23.6% | −1.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 2.88 | 0.31 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 5.10 |
| Interest coverage | −6.9× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.85 | 1.35 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.25 | 2.15 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.70% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.70% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 52.2% | 95.6% |
| Held by insiders | 39.0% | 11.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7.6M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 19.6% | 5.6% |
Go deeper
- FLWS stock overview
- FLWS income statement
- FLWS valuation and score
- TITN stock overview
- TITN income statement
- TITN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.