StockData

Flux Power vs U Power

FLUX and UCAR side by side, both in electronic and other electrical equipment and components, except computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FLUX and UCAR compare

U Power grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−7.1% versus −36.6% for Flux Power).

Flux Power keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −17.7% compared with −167% at U Power.

Flux Power scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 6 for U Power), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFLUXUCAR
Size and price
Market cap$6.7M–
Share price$0.309$2.95
Change, 1 year−87.0%−99.3%
Change, 5 years−94.3%–
Beta (5Y)1.982.65
Employees11925
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)6
Valuation score2 (better)0
Growth score02 (better)
Performance score22
Health score5 (better)2
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.2×–
P/B2.6×–
FCF yield−96.2%–
Fair value$1.18–
Margin of safety73.9%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−36.6%−7.1% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average9.9%94.9% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin30.2%36.3% (better)
Operating margin−15.4% (better)−142%
Net margin−17.7% (better)−167%
FCF margin−15.3% (better)−171%
Return on equity–−24.4%
Return on invested capital–−16.6%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.07 (better)
Interest coverage–−309.9×
Current ratio1.031.80 (better)
Altman Z-score−5.51–
Piotroski F-score33
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions24.5%0.10%
Held by insiders20.6%37.8%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$130K$3.0M (better)
Short interest, % of float4.3%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.