Flutter Entertainment vs Sportradar
FLUT and SRAD side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FLUT and SRAD compare
Sportradar grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.6% versus 15.2% for Flutter Entertainment).
Sportradar scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 4 for Flutter Entertainment), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FLUT | SRAD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $14.3B | – |
| Share price | $82.59 | $12.03 |
| Change, 1 year | −65.1% | −54.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −51.2% | −45.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.18 | 1.44 |
| Employees | 29K | 5,090 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.8× | – |
| P/B | 1.6× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 24.3× | – |
| P/FCF | 11.5× | – |
| FCF yield | 8.7% | – |
| Fair value | $81.61 | – |
| Margin of safety | −1.2% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 15.2% | 16.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 51.8% (better) | 26.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 194% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −312% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 42.5% | 85.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | −3.7% | – |
| Net margin | – | 7.8% |
| FCF margin | 7.2% | 30.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 10.5% |
| Return on invested capital | −2.7% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.37 | 0.06 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 10.13 (better) | −1.11 |
| Interest coverage | −0.9× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.89 | 1.17 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.35 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 5.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 5.6% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 82.6% | 16.6% |
| Held by insiders | 19.0% | 9.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.1M | $11.3M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 10.7% | – |
Go deeper
- FLUT stock overview
- FLUT income statement
- FLUT valuation and score
- SRAD stock overview
- SRAD income statement
- SRAD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.