Flowco vs Oil States International
FLOC and OIS side by side, both in construction, mining, and materials handling. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FLOC and OIS compare
Flowco is the larger company, worth 3.7 times as much as Oil States International ($1.9B against $511M).
Flowco grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.4% versus −0.74% for Oil States International).
Flowco keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.4% compared with −16.5% at Oil States International.
Flowco pays a dividend yielding 1.6%; Oil States International does not pay one.
Flowco scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 5 for Oil States International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FLOC | OIS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.9B | $511M |
| Share price | $21.09 | $8.55 |
| Change, 1 year | 20.7% | 30.7% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 71.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.89 | 0.93 |
| Employees | 1,281 | 2,172 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 2.1× | 0.8× (better) |
| P/B | 3.5× | 0.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.2× | – |
| P/FCF | 8.0× (better) | 15.1× |
| FCF yield | 12.5% (better) | 6.6% |
| Fair value | $10.15 | $7.75 |
| Margin of safety | −108% | −10.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 20.4% (better) | −0.74% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 0.95% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −565% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −592% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 53.9% (better) | 20.2% |
| Operating margin | 18.6% (better) | −14.0% |
| Net margin | 6.4% (better) | −16.5% |
| FCF margin | 26.4% (better) | 5.2% |
| Return on equity | 12.5% (better) | −16.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 23.7% (better) | −11.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.67 | 0.03 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.65 | – |
| Interest coverage | 8.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.19 (better) | 2.36 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.72 (better) | 2.27 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.6% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.87% | 1.9% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 2.5% (better) | 1.9% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 48.3% | 92.8% |
| Held by insiders | 53.2% | 8.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$384M | −$593K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.0% | 4.0% |
Go deeper
- FLOC stock overview
- FLOC income statement
- FLOC valuation and score
- OIS stock overview
- OIS income statement
- OIS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.