StockData

Fluent vs Inuvo

FLNT and INUV side by side, both in business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FLNT and INUV compare

Fluent is the larger company, worth 17 times as much as Inuvo ($109M against $6.5M).

Fluent grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−12.0% versus −46.6% for Inuvo).

Inuvo keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −8.6% compared with −11.5% at Fluent.

Inuvo scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 2 for Fluent), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFLNTINUV
Size and price
Market cap$109M$6.5M
Share price$3.46$0.395
Change, 1 year77.4%−84.3%
Change, 5 years−73.8%−93.8%
Beta (5Y)1.081.32
Employees18672
StockData Score
Total score25 (better)
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score12 (better)
Health score00
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.5×0.1× (better)
P/B13.5×0.8× (better)
FCF yield−4.0% (better)−55.7%
Fair value–$1.28
Margin of safety–69.2%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−12.0% (better)−46.6%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−7.6%14.1% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin26.5%63.2% (better)
Operating margin−7.4% (better)−18.8%
Net margin−11.5%−8.6% (better)
FCF margin−2.1% (better)−6.9%
Return on equity−170%−43.9% (better)
Return on invested capital−33.6% (better)−65.1%
Financial health
Debt / equity3.940.77 (better)
Interest coverage−5.5×–
Current ratio0.88 (better)0.60
Altman Z-score−5.48 (better)−8.54
Piotroski F-score5 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–−0.31%
Shareholder yield0.00% (better)−0.31%
Ownership
Held by institutions13.9%20.1%
Held by insiders67.5%44.8%
Insider net buying, 12 months$858K–
Short interest, % of float0.58%4.2%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.