StockData

Fluent vs Ibotta

FLNT and IBTA side by side, both in business services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FLNT and IBTA compare

Ibotta is the larger company, worth 13 times as much as Fluent ($1.4B against $109M).

Ibotta grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−6.6% versus −12.0% for Fluent).

Ibotta keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −3.2% compared with −11.5% at Fluent.

Ibotta scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 2 for Fluent), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFLNTIBTA
Size and price
Market cap$109M$1.4B
Share price$3.46$59.94
Change, 1 year77.4%111%
Change, 5 years−73.8%136%
Beta (5Y)1.08−0.24
Employees186800
StockData Score
Total score29 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score11
Performance score12 (better)
Health score06 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.5× (better)4.0×
P/B13.5×5.7× (better)
P/FCF–18.7×
FCF yield−4.0%5.4% (better)
Fair value–$28.74
Margin of safety–−109%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−12.0%−6.6% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−7.6%–
Net income growth (TTM)–−111%
Profitability
Gross margin26.5%78.2% (better)
Operating margin−7.4%−3.5% (better)
Net margin−11.5%−3.2% (better)
FCF margin−2.1%21.7% (better)
Return on equity−170%−3.7% (better)
Return on invested capital−33.6%−9.6% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity3.94 (better)0.00
Interest coverage−5.5×–
Current ratio0.881.71 (better)
Altman Z-score−5.483.99 (better)
Piotroski F-score5 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–11.8%
Shareholder yield0.00%11.8% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions13.9%60.3%
Held by insiders67.5%92.4%
Insider net buying, 12 months$858K (better)−$103M
Short interest, % of float0.58%151%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.