Full House Resorts vs Target Hospitality
FLL and TH side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FLL and TH compare
Target Hospitality is the larger company, worth 55 times as much as Full House Resorts ($1.2B against $21.2M).
Target Hospitality grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (19.9% versus 3.3% for Full House Resorts).
Target Hospitality keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −12.2% compared with −12.2% at Full House Resorts.
Target Hospitality scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 4 for Full House Resorts), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FLL | TH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $21.2M | $1.2B |
| Share price | $0.578 | $11.80 |
| Change, 1 year | −78.1% | 76.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −94.2% | 199% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.60 | 0.31 |
| Employees | 1,831 | 902 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 3.1× |
| P/B | – | 3.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.3× (better) | 27.9× |
| P/FCF | 2.8× | – |
| FCF yield | 35.6% | – |
| Fair value | – | $14.46 |
| Margin of safety | – | 18.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.3% | 19.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 19.2% (better) | 7.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 93.1% (better) | 15.7% |
| Operating margin | 2.6% (better) | −9.5% |
| Net margin | −12.2% | −12.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 2.4% | – |
| Return on equity | – | −12.5% |
| Return on invested capital | 1.5% (better) | −6.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.69 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 8.91 | 4.52 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 0.2× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.80 (better) | 0.45 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.23 | 1.73 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 38.1% | 50.9% |
| Held by insiders | 8.8% | 20.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$201M |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.9% | 4.6% |
Go deeper
- FLL stock overview
- FLL income statement
- FLL valuation and score
- TH stock overview
- TH income statement
- TH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.