Full House Resorts vs Red Rock Resorts
FLL and RRR side by side, both in hotels and motels. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FLL and RRR compare
Red Rock Resorts is the larger company, worth 249 times as much as Full House Resorts ($5.3B against $21.2M).
Full House Resorts grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.3% versus 1.1% for Red Rock Resorts).
Red Rock Resorts keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.8% compared with −12.2% at Full House Resorts.
Red Rock Resorts pays a dividend yielding 2.1%; Full House Resorts does not pay one.
Red Rock Resorts scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 4 for Full House Resorts), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FLL | RRR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $21.2M | $5.3B |
| Share price | $0.578 | $50.18 |
| Change, 1 year | −78.1% | −15.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −94.2% | −1.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.60 | 1.12 |
| Employees | 1,831 | 9,500 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 30.0× |
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 2.6× |
| P/B | – | 32.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.3× (better) | 13.2× |
| P/FCF | 2.8× (better) | 104× |
| FCF yield | 35.6% (better) | 0.96% |
| Fair value | – | $35.15 |
| Margin of safety | – | −42.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.3% (better) | 1.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 19.2% (better) | 11.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −38.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −41.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 93.1% | – |
| Operating margin | 2.6% | 22.3% (better) |
| Net margin | −12.2% | 5.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | 2.4% | 2.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 60.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 1.5% | 10.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 22.61 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 8.91 | 5.29 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 0.2× | 2.3× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.80 | 0.84 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.23 | 1.58 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.1% |
| Payout ratio | – | 104% |
| Buyback yield | – | 2.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 4.2% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 38.1% | 50.9% |
| Held by insiders | 8.8% | 44.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$3.0M |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.9% | 6.9% |
Go deeper
- FLL stock overview
- FLL income statement
- FLL valuation and score
- RRR stock overview
- RRR income statement
- RRR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.