Full House Resorts vs Monarch Casino & Resort
FLL and MCRI side by side, both in hotels and motels. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FLL and MCRI compare
Monarch Casino & Resort is the larger company, worth 93 times as much as Full House Resorts ($2.0B against $21.2M).
Monarch Casino & Resort grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (4.8% versus 3.3% for Full House Resorts).
Monarch Casino & Resort keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.4% compared with −12.2% at Full House Resorts.
Monarch Casino & Resort pays a dividend yielding 1.1%; Full House Resorts does not pay one.
Monarch Casino & Resort scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 4 for Full House Resorts), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FLL | MCRI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $21.2M | $2.0B |
| Share price | $0.578 | $111.94 |
| Change, 1 year | −78.1% | 18.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −94.2% | 57.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.60 | 0.86 |
| Employees | 1,831 | 2,740 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 20 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 17.7× |
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 3.5× |
| P/B | – | 3.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.3× (better) | 9.6× |
| P/FCF | 2.8× (better) | 13.8× |
| PEG | – | 2.65 |
| FCF yield | 35.6% (better) | 7.2% |
| Fair value | – | $113.97 |
| Margin of safety | – | 1.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.3% | 4.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 19.2% | 24.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 39.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 43.4% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 34.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 93.1% (better) | 25.5% |
| Operating margin | 2.6% | – |
| Net margin | −12.2% | 20.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 2.4% | 25.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 20.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 1.5% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 8.91 | – |
| Interest coverage | 0.2× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.80 | 1.17 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 0.23 | 9.20 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 9 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.1% |
| Payout ratio | – | 18.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | – | 4.9% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 6.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 38.1% | 66.0% |
| Held by insiders | 8.8% | 24.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$1.6M |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.9% | 4.2% |
Go deeper
- FLL stock overview
- FLL income statement
- FLL valuation and score
- MCRI stock overview
- MCRI income statement
- MCRI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.