StockData

Fulgent Genetics vs Personalis

FLGT and PSNL side by side, both in health services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FLGT and PSNL compare

Personalis is the larger company, worth 2.5 times as much as Fulgent Genetics ($1.7B against $679M).

Personalis grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.9% versus 4.7% for Fulgent Genetics).

Fulgent Genetics keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −27.5% compared with −148% at Personalis.

Fulgent Genetics scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 5 for Personalis), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFLGTPSNL
Size and price
Market cap$679M$1.7B
Share price$24.66$15.71
Change, 1 year−15.2%96.1%
Change, 5 years−73.8%5.1%
Beta (5Y)0.891.87
Employees1,300260
StockData Score
Total score8 (better)5
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score00
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score45 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S2.1× (better)20.8×
P/B0.7× (better)7.9×
FCF yield−0.21% (better)−6.4%
Fair value$46.08$3.28
Margin of safety46.5% (better)−379%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)4.7%16.9% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−5.2%−2.4% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin33.8% (better)16.7%
Operating margin−39.2% (better)−157%
Net margin−27.5% (better)−148%
FCF margin−0.42% (better)−133%
Return on equity−8.6% (better)−62.1%
Return on invested capital−12.0% (better)−465%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00 (better)0.00
Interest coverage−1307.9×−684.0× (better)
Current ratio5.34 (better)4.53
Altman Z-score5.188.83 (better)
Piotroski F-score44
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield9.5% (better)−8.0%
Shareholder yield9.5% (better)−8.0%
Ownership
Held by institutions57.0%79.6%
Held by insiders39.5%15.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$286K (better)−$6.9M
Short interest, % of float12.1%7.4%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.