StockData

Fulgent Genetics vs Grail

FLGT and GRAL side by side, both in health services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FLGT and GRAL compare

Grail is the larger company, worth 7.6 times as much as Fulgent Genetics ($5.2B against $679M).

Grail grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.5% versus 4.7% for Fulgent Genetics).

Fulgent Genetics keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −27.5% compared with −244% at Grail.

Grail scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 8 for Fulgent Genetics), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFLGTGRAL
Size and price
Market cap$679M$5.2B
Share price$24.66$115.89
Change, 1 year−15.2%36.7%
Change, 5 years−73.8%–
Beta (5Y)0.892.49
Employees1,300910
StockData Score
Total score810 (better)
Valuation score3 (better)1
Growth score02 (better)
Performance score11
Health score46 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S2.1× (better)31.1×
P/B0.7× (better)2.1×
FCF yield−0.21% (better)−6.0%
Fair value$46.08–
Margin of safety46.5%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)4.7%17.5% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−5.2%–
Profitability
Gross margin33.8%–
Operating margin−39.2% (better)−347%
Net margin−27.5% (better)−244%
FCF margin−0.42% (better)−187%
Return on equity−8.6% (better)−17.3%
Return on invested capital−12.0% (better)−27.1%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00 (better)0.00
Interest coverage−1307.9×–
Current ratio5.348.93 (better)
Altman Z-score5.185.51 (better)
Piotroski F-score45 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield9.5%–
Shareholder yield9.5% (better)0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions57.0%87.6%
Held by insiders39.5%11.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$286K (better)−$38.0M
Short interest, % of float12.1%20.1%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.