StockData

Fold vs TON Strategy

FLD and TONX side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FLD and TONX compare

TON Strategy is the larger company, worth 5.7 times as much as Fold ($169M against $29.4M).

TON Strategy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (592% versus −2.5% for Fold).

Fold keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −259% compared with −533% at TON Strategy.

TON Strategy scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 4 for Fold), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFLDTONX
Size and price
Market cap$29.4M$169M
Share price$0.535$3.06
Change, 1 year−85.5%−28.5%
Change, 5 years–−100.0%
Beta (5Y)0.241.26
Employees40–
StockData Score
Total score413 (better)
Valuation score33
Growth score03 (better)
Performance score01 (better)
Health score16 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S1.0× (better)5.7×
P/B0.9×0.4× (better)
FCF yield–−18.6%
Fair value$1.20$4.74
Margin of safety55.6% (better)35.5%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−2.5%592% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–5.1%
Profitability
Gross margin–83.1%
Operating margin–−116%
Net margin−259% (better)−533%
FCF margin–−106%
Return on equity−122%−75.5% (better)
Return on invested capital–−14.3%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Current ratio1.846.39 (better)
Altman Z-score−3.8218.87 (better)
Piotroski F-score34 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−25.9%–
Shareholder yield−25.9%0.00% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions18.7%61.5%
Held by insiders–38.7%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$173K (better)−$8.1M
Short interest, % of float–8.5%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.