Fold vs Nakamoto
FLD and NAKA side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FLD and NAKA compare
Nakamoto is the larger company, worth 3.6 times as much as Fold ($105M against $29.4M).
Nakamoto grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1145% versus −2.5% for Fold).
Fold keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −259% compared with −1508% at Nakamoto.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FLD | NAKA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $29.4M | $105M |
| Share price | $0.535 | $5.86 |
| Change, 1 year | −85.5% | −84.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.24 | 3.67 |
| Employees | 40 | 65 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 1.0× (better) | 3.8× |
| P/B | 0.9× | 0.4× (better) |
| Fair value | $1.20 | $9.65 |
| Margin of safety | 55.6% (better) | 39.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −2.5% | 1145% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | −1681% |
| Net margin | −259% (better) | −1508% |
| Return on equity | −122% (better) | −343% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −336% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | −30.7× |
| Current ratio | 1.84 (better) | 0.15 |
| Altman Z-score | −3.82 (better) | −5.12 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | −25.9% | – |
| Shareholder yield | −25.9% | 0.00% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 18.7% | 14.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$173K | $1.2M (better) |
Go deeper
- FLD stock overview
- FLD income statement
- FLD valuation and score
- NAKA stock overview
- NAKA income statement
- NAKA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.