StockData

Fold vs Metalpha Technology

FLD and MATH side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FLD and MATH compare

Fold grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−2.5% versus −16.7% for Metalpha Technology).

Metalpha Technology keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.5% compared with −259% at Fold.

Metalpha Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 4 for Fold), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFLDMATH
Size and price
Market cap$29.4M–
Share price$0.535$0.999
Change, 1 year−85.5%−66.8%
Change, 5 years–−38.3%
Beta (5Y)0.240.71
Employees4035
StockData Score
Total score48 (better)
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score02 (better)
Health score15 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S1.0×–
P/B0.9×–
Fair value$1.20–
Margin of safety55.6%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−2.5% (better)−16.7%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–177%
Net income growth (TTM)–−91.9%
EPS growth (TTM)–−92.9%
Profitability
Gross margin–41.4%
Operating margin–3.6%
Net margin−259%3.5% (better)
Return on equity−122%–
Financial health
Interest coverage–76.1×
Current ratio1.84 (better)1.12
Altman Z-score−3.82–
Piotroski F-score3 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−25.9%–
Shareholder yield−25.9%–
Ownership
Held by institutions18.7%0.85%
Held by insiders–14.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$173K–
Short interest, % of float–0.13%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.