National Beverage vs Zevia PBC
FIZZ and ZVIA side by side, both in beverages. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FIZZ and ZVIA compare
National Beverage is the larger company, worth 36 times as much as Zevia PBC ($3.3B against $92.0M).
Zevia PBC grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.2% versus −1.8% for National Beverage).
National Beverage keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.8% compared with −5.3% at Zevia PBC.
National Beverage pays a dividend yielding 9.2%; Zevia PBC does not pay one.
National Beverage scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 11 for Zevia PBC), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FIZZ | ZVIA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.3B | $92.0M |
| Share price | $35.30 | $1.19 |
| Change, 1 year | 8.7% | −49.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −43.3% | −90.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.53 | 1.46 |
| Employees | 1,677 | 88 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 19.0× | – |
| P/S | 2.8× | 0.5× (better) |
| P/B | 9.0× | 2.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.2× | – |
| P/FCF | 20.4× (better) | 31.7× |
| PEG | 2.15 | – |
| FCF yield | 4.9% (better) | 3.2% |
| Fair value | $42.13 | $2.19 |
| Margin of safety | 16.2% | 45.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.8% | 7.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 1.9% | 7.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −5.9% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −6.5% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 1.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 36.2% | 47.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | 18.4% (better) | −5.7% |
| Net margin | 14.8% (better) | −5.3% |
| FCF margin | 13.7% (better) | 1.7% |
| Return on equity | 40.1% (better) | −18.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 64.6% (better) | −36.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 2.39 (better) | 1.90 |
| Altman Z-score | 13.72 (better) | 1.48 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 9.2% | – |
| Payout ratio | 174% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 9.2% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 26.3% | 53.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.22% | 27.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $7.9K (better) | −$11.9M |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.8% | 1.9% |
Go deeper
- FIZZ stock overview
- FIZZ income statement
- FIZZ valuation and score
- ZVIA stock overview
- ZVIA income statement
- ZVIA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.