StockData

Figure Technology Solutions vs Onity

FIGR and ONIT side by side, both in non-depository credit institutions. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FIGR and ONIT compare

Figure Technology Solutions is the larger company, worth 23 times as much as Onity ($5.4B against $236M).

On earnings, Onity is cheaper: it trades at 2.0× trailing earnings, against 25.2× for Figure Technology Solutions.

Figure Technology Solutions grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (88.8% versus 14.4% for Onity).

Figure Technology Solutions keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 33.5% compared with 11.1% at Onity.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFIGRONIT
Size and price
Market cap$5.4B$236M
Share price$24.19$28.24
Change, 1 year−35.7%−30.5%
Change, 5 years−96.0%−12.0%
Beta (5Y)−0.691.01
Employees3074,300
StockData Score
Total score66
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score11
Performance score3 (better)2
Health score2 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E25.2×2.0× (better)
P/S7.7×0.2× (better)
P/B3.8×–
EV/EBITDA21.4×–
PEG–0.02
FCF yield–−747%
Fair value$10.17–
Margin of safety−138%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)88.8% (better)14.4%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–2.1%
Net income growth (TTM)283% (better)273%
EPS growth (TTM)500% (better)296%
Profitability
Operating margin28.4%–
Net margin33.5% (better)11.1%
FCF margin–−154%
Return on equity26.8%–
Return on invested capital52.2%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.22–
Net debt / EBITDA−5.57–
Current ratio1.86–
Altman Z-score2.90 (better)0.12
Piotroski F-score6 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions53.2%58.9%
Held by insiders30.6%10.8%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$56.2M–
Superinvestors holding1–
Short interest, % of float–6.5%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.