StockData

FiEE vs Parabolic Technologies

FIEE and PARA side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FIEE and PARA compare

FiEE is the larger company, worth 61 times as much as Parabolic Technologies ($22.4M against $369K).

FiEE grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (868% versus 19.6% for Parabolic Technologies).

FiEE keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.3% compared with −229% at Parabolic Technologies.

Parabolic Technologies pays a dividend yielding 962%; FiEE does not pay one.

FiEE scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 14 for Parabolic Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFIEEPARA
Size and price
Market cap$22.4M$369K
Share price$2.63$0.104
Change, 1 year6.7%−100.0%
Change, 5 years−92.6%−100%
Beta (5Y)0.71−1.04
Employees333
StockData Score
Total score15 (better)14
Valuation score4 (better)3
Growth score23 (better)
Performance score4 (better)1
Health score5 (better)4
Dividend score03 (better)
Valuation
P/E26.3×–
P/S3.6×0.0× (better)
P/B1.7×0.0× (better)
EV/EBITDA10.0×–
P/FCF6.5×–
FCF yield15.4%–
Fair value$3.29$11.92
Margin of safety20.1%99.1% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)868% (better)19.6%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−33.6%–
Profitability
Gross margin86.4% (better)81.2%
Operating margin25.0% (better)−178%
Net margin17.3% (better)−229%
FCF margin55.7%–
Return on equity16.8% (better)−319%
Return on invested capital29.2% (better)−242%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Interest coverage173×–
Current ratio4.68 (better)0.10
Altman Z-score−1.48 (better)−7.37
Piotroski F-score8 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield–962%
Buyback yield−17.8%–
Shareholder yield−17.8%962% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions0.01%98.8%
Insider net buying, 12 months$2.8M (better)−$602K

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.