First Interstate BancSystem vs M&T Bank
FIBK and MTB side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FIBK and MTB compare
M&T Bank is the larger company, worth 8.9 times as much as First Interstate BancSystem ($31.9B against $3.6B).
On earnings, First Interstate BancSystem is cheaper: it trades at 11.6× trailing earnings, against 11.7× for M&T Bank.
M&T Bank grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.4% versus 6.0% for First Interstate BancSystem).
M&T Bank keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 178% compared with 30.3% at First Interstate BancSystem.
Both pay dividends: First Interstate BancSystem yields 5.0% and M&T Bank 2.7%.
First Interstate BancSystem scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 17 for M&T Bank), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FIBK | MTB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.6B | $31.9B |
| Share price | $37.65 | $220.72 |
| Change, 1 year | 17.3% | 21.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −12.9% | 42.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.77 | 0.82 |
| Employees | 3,376 | 22K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 19 (better) | 17 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.6× (better) | 11.7× |
| P/S | 3.4× (better) | 18.7× |
| P/B | 1.1× (better) | 1.1× |
| PEG | 0.80 (better) | 0.84 |
| Fair value | $40.09 | $229.32 |
| Margin of safety | 6.1% (better) | 3.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.0% | 6.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 10.1% (better) | −22.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 41.3% (better) | 12.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 46.4% (better) | 22.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 3.0% | 11.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 30.3% | 178% (better) |
| Return on equity | 9.6% | 10.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.17 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.21 | 0.25 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.0% (better) | 2.7% |
| Payout ratio | 58.2% | 29.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −1.2% | – |
| Buyback yield | 7.7% | 8.2% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 12.7% (better) | 10.9% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 95.8% | 91.4% |
| Held by insiders | 43.7% | 0.36% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$8.0M (better) | −$26.4M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 16.1% | 3.5% |
Go deeper
- FIBK stock overview
- FIBK income statement
- FIBK valuation and score
- MTB stock overview
- MTB income statement
- MTB valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.