FGI Industries vs Masco
FGI and MAS side by side, both in fabricated metal products, except machinery and transportation equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FGI and MAS compare
Masco is the larger company, worth 1069 times as much as FGI Industries ($16.4B against $15.3M).
Masco grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (0.95% versus −5.3% for FGI Industries).
Masco keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 12.1% compared with −3.1% at FGI Industries.
Masco pays a dividend yielding 1.1%; FGI Industries does not pay one.
Masco scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 5 for FGI Industries), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FGI | MAS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $15.3M | $16.4B |
| Share price | $7.93 | $84.91 |
| Change, 1 year | 51.0% | 38.1% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 25.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.13 | 1.00 |
| Employees | 426 | 18K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 18.4× |
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 2.1× |
| P/B | 0.9× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 52.2× | 12.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 8.5× (better) | 15.7× |
| PEG | – | 8.88 |
| FCF yield | 11.7% (better) | 6.4% |
| Fair value | $39.71 | $81.37 |
| Margin of safety | 80.0% (better) | −4.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −5.3% | 0.95% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 1.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 12.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 18.8% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −3.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 28.3% | 37.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 0.33% | 17.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −3.1% | 12.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.4% | 13.6% (better) |
| Return on equity | −20.6% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 1.2% | 46.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.76 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 20.54 | 1.73 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 0.3× | 12.8× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.18 | 1.83 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.17 | 4.13 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.1% |
| Payout ratio | – | 27.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 12 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 17.9% |
| Buyback yield | – | 6.5% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 7.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 104% |
| Held by insiders | 6.9% | 0.34% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$7.9M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- FGI stock overview
- FGI income statement
- FGI valuation and score
- MAS stock overview
- MAS income statement
- MAS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.