FG Communities vs TAO Synergies
FGC and TAOX side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FGC and TAOX compare
FG Communities is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as TAO Synergies ($30.4M against $15.7M).
TAO Synergies scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 3 for FG Communities), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FGC | TAOX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $30.4M | $15.7M |
| Share price | $5.97 | $2.10 |
| Change, 1 year | −59.5% | −72.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −98.7% | −99.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.73 | 1.71 |
| Employees | 15 | 4 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 12.6× (better) | 20.3× |
| P/B | 0.5× (better) | 1.2× |
| Fair value | – | $0.840 |
| Margin of safety | – | −150% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 175% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | −3890% | −1013% (better) |
| Net margin | – | −2155% |
| Return on equity | – | −111% |
| Return on invested capital | −60.2% (better) | −93.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.03 (better) | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | – | 19.99 |
| Altman Z-score | −4.06 | −3.02 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 23.0% | 9.5% |
| Held by insiders | 40.2% | 2.6% |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 5.7% |
Go deeper
- FGC stock overview
- FGC income statement
- FGC valuation and score
- TAOX stock overview
- TAOX income statement
- TAOX valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.