FG Communities vs Pineapple Financial
FGC and PTIV side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FGC and PTIV compare
FG Communities grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (230% versus −6.6% for Pineapple Financial).
Pineapple Financial scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 3 for FG Communities), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FGC | PTIV |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $23.7M | – |
| Share price | $4.66 | $0.727 |
| Change, 1 year | −74.5% | −82.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.1% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.70 | −0.80 |
| Employees | 15 | 39 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 9.7× | – |
| P/B | 0.4× | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 230% (better) | −6.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 43.9% |
| Operating margin | −4197% | −14.5% (better) |
| Net margin | – | −90.1% |
| Return on equity | – | −9.6% |
| Return on invested capital | −159% | −1.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.03 (better) | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | – | 1.00 |
| Altman Z-score | −4.66 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 23.0% | 0.59% |
| Held by insiders | 40.2% | 62.1% |
Go deeper
- FGC stock overview
- FGC income statement
- FGC valuation and score
- PTIV stock overview
- PTIV income statement
- PTIV valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.