StockData

Masonglory vs PMA Graphene Technology

FFTT and PMA side by side, both in industrials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FFTT and PMA compare

Masonglory grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.0% versus −56.8% for PMA Graphene Technology).

Masonglory keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −34.0% compared with −39.4% at PMA Graphene Technology.

Masonglory scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 0 for PMA Graphene Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFFTTPMA
Size and price
Share price$3.87$1.35
Change, 1 year−68.6%−38.6%
Beta (5Y)2.681.05
Employees117
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)0
Valuation score00
Growth score2 (better)0
Performance score00
Health score5 (better)0
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)1.0% (better)−56.8%
Net income growth (TTM)−727%–
EPS growth (TTM)460%–
Profitability
Gross margin4.4% (better)−18.4%
Operating margin−33.2% (better)−37.4%
Net margin−34.0% (better)−39.4%
FCF margin−24.6%–
Return on equity−135%–
Return on invested capital−135%−53.4% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Interest coverage–−15.8×
Current ratio3.13 (better)0.71
Piotroski F-score4 (better)2
Ownership
Held by institutions0.18%0.77%
Held by insiders51.7%68.1%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$1.7M
Short interest, % of float–2.9%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.