StockData

Masonglory vs Phoenix Asia

FFTT and PHOE side by side, both in industrials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FFTT and PHOE compare

Masonglory grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.0% versus −2.2% for Phoenix Asia).

Phoenix Asia keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −16.7% compared with −34.0% at Masonglory.

Masonglory scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 5 for Phoenix Asia), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFFTTPHOE
Size and price
Share price$3.87$16.73
Change, 1 year−68.6%−12.0%
Beta (5Y)2.680.31
Employees1132
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)5
Valuation score00
Growth score2 (better)1
Performance score00
Health score5 (better)4
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)1.0% (better)−2.2%
Net income growth (TTM)−727%−217% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)460% (better)−200%
Profitability
Gross margin4.4%4.6% (better)
Operating margin−33.2%−16.8% (better)
Net margin−34.0%−16.7% (better)
FCF margin−24.6%–
Return on equity−135%−25.9% (better)
Return on invested capital−135%−31.9% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Interest coverage–−487.7×
Current ratio3.135.46 (better)
Piotroski F-score4 (better)2
Ownership
Held by institutions0.18%–
Held by insiders51.7%74.5%
Short interest, % of float–0.02%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.