FutureFuel vs LanzaTech Global
FF and LNZA side by side, both in chemicals and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FF and LNZA compare
FutureFuel is the larger company, worth 2.2 times as much as LanzaTech Global ($123M against $55.3M).
FutureFuel grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (71.2% versus 43.8% for LanzaTech Global).
LanzaTech Global keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 296% compared with −10.9% at FutureFuel.
FutureFuel pays a dividend yielding 5.0%; LanzaTech Global does not pay one.
FutureFuel scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 12 for LanzaTech Global), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FF | LNZA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $123M | $55.3M |
| Share price | $2.81 | $4.22 |
| Change, 1 year | −27.6% | −75.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −65.9% | −99.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.83 | 0.99 |
| Employees | 493 | 192 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 0.3× |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 0.9× |
| P/B | 0.9× | 0.2× (better) |
| FCF yield | −47.1% (better) | −61.1% |
| Fair value | $4.96 | – |
| Margin of safety | 43.3% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 71.2% (better) | 43.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −14.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | −5.0% | – |
| Operating margin | −11.5% (better) | −61.0% |
| Net margin | −10.9% | 296% (better) |
| FCF margin | −24.7% (better) | −58.0% |
| Return on equity | −16.2% | 146% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −20.4% (better) | −37.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −500.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.87 (better) | 2.48 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.01 (better) | −3.18 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.0% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 5.0% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 38.6% | 25.4% |
| Held by insiders | 40.5% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $42.8K | $4.3M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.8% | – |
Go deeper
- FF stock overview
- FF income statement
- FF valuation and score
- LNZA stock overview
- LNZA income statement
- LNZA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.