Forum Energy Technologies vs Flowco
FET and FLOC side by side, both in construction, mining, and materials handling. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FET and FLOC compare
Flowco is the larger company, worth 2.2 times as much as Forum Energy Technologies ($1.9B against $869M).
Flowco grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.4% versus 10.6% for Forum Energy Technologies).
Flowco keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.4% compared with 3.5% at Forum Energy Technologies.
Flowco pays a dividend yielding 1.6%; Forum Energy Technologies does not pay one.
Forum Energy Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 9 for Flowco), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FET | FLOC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $869M | $1.9B |
| Share price | $75.77 | $20.89 |
| Change, 1 year | 157% | 22.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 292% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 0.89 |
| Employees | 1,700 | 1,281 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 9 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 29.7× | – |
| P/S | 1.0× (better) | 2.1× |
| P/B | 2.7× (better) | 3.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.0× | 6.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | 14.0× | 7.9× (better) |
| FCF yield | 7.1% | 12.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $66.17 | $10.34 |
| Margin of safety | −14.5% (better) | −102% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 10.6% | 20.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 30.6% | 53.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | 7.4% | 18.6% (better) |
| Net margin | 3.5% | 6.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 7.1% | 26.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | 9.8% | 12.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 10.1% | 23.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.40 (better) | 0.67 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.44 | 0.65 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 8.7× |
| Current ratio | 2.04 | 3.19 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.37 | 2.70 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Buyback yield | 2.6% (better) | 0.88% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.6% (better) | 2.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 85.6% | 48.3% |
| Held by insiders | 10.1% | 53.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.4M (better) | −$384M |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.1% | 9.0% |
Go deeper
- FET stock overview
- FET income statement
- FET valuation and score
- FLOC stock overview
- FLOC income statement
- FLOC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.