Ferguson Enterprises vs Resideo Technologies
FERG and REZI side by side, both in wholesale trade-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FERG and REZI compare
Ferguson Enterprises is the larger company, worth 15 times as much as Resideo Technologies ($49.6B against $3.3B).
On earnings, Resideo Technologies is cheaper: it trades at 13.3× trailing earnings, against 25.9× for Ferguson Enterprises.
Resideo Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (59.1% versus 4.9% for Ferguson Enterprises).
Ferguson Enterprises keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.3% compared with 2.9% at Resideo Technologies.
Ferguson Enterprises pays a dividend yielding 1.4%; Resideo Technologies does not pay one.
Ferguson Enterprises scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 10 for Resideo Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FERG | REZI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $49.6B | $3.3B |
| Share price | $256.47 | $21.46 |
| Change, 1 year | 1.3% | −29.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 58.8% | −21.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 1.34 |
| Employees | 35K | 15K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 25.9× | 13.3× (better) |
| P/S | 1.6× | 0.3× (better) |
| P/B | 7.5× | 3.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.9× | 6.5× (better) |
| P/FCF | 30.1× | 19.4× (better) |
| FCF yield | 3.3% | 5.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $181.85 | $29.65 |
| Margin of safety | −41.0% | 27.6% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 4.9% | 59.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.1% (better) | 8.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 16.0% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 18.8% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 17.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 30.8% (better) | 28.0% |
| Operating margin | 8.7% (better) | 5.9% |
| Net margin | 6.3% (better) | 2.9% |
| FCF margin | 5.3% (better) | 1.7% |
| Return on equity | 31.3% (better) | 15.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 19.5% (better) | 9.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.93 (better) | 2.20 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.84 (better) | 2.34 |
| Interest coverage | – | 3.3× |
| Current ratio | 1.74 (better) | 1.42 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.76 (better) | 3.13 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.4% | – |
| Payout ratio | 33.4% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 17.7% | – |
| Buyback yield | 1.8% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 3.2% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 96.8% | 99.2% |
| Held by insiders | 0.18% | 24.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$9.7M | $848K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 10 (better) | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.2% | 7.7% |
Go deeper
- FERG stock overview
- FERG income statement
- FERG valuation and score
- REZI stock overview
- REZI income statement
- REZI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.