Ferrovial vs KBR
FER and KBR side by side, both in heavy construction other than building construction contractors. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FER and KBR compare
Ferrovial grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.2% versus −2.4% for KBR).
Ferrovial keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.2% compared with 5.7% at KBR.
KBR pays a dividend yielding 1.7%; Ferrovial does not pay one.
KBR scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 5 for Ferrovial), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FER | KBR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $4.9B |
| Share price | $55.29 | $38.70 |
| Change, 1 year | −12.3% | −9.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 62.4% | −10.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.46 | 0.67 |
| Employees | 23K | 36K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 11.1× |
| P/S | – | 0.6× |
| P/B | – | 2.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 7.8× |
| P/FCF | – | 14.9× |
| PEG | – | 0.30 |
| FCF yield | – | 6.7% |
| Fair value | – | $87.26 |
| Margin of safety | – | 55.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.2% (better) | −2.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 6.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −72.6% | 16.3% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −72.3% | 19.9% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 14.7% |
| Operating margin | – | 9.3% |
| Net margin | 9.2% (better) | 5.7% |
| FCF margin | – | 4.2% |
| Return on equity | 14.8% | 27.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 15.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.18 (better) | 1.44 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −2.05 | 2.35 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 5.0× |
| Current ratio | 1.13 (better) | 0.94 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 2.38 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.7% |
| Payout ratio | – | 19.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 6 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 10.5% |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.1% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 2.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 33.5% | 104% |
| Held by insiders | 22.1% | 1.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $945K |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 8.3% |
Go deeper
- FER stock overview
- FER income statement
- FER valuation and score
- KBR stock overview
- KBR income statement
- KBR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.