StockData

Ferrovial vs Fluor

FER and FLR side by side, both in heavy construction other than building construction contractors. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FER and FLR compare

Ferrovial grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.2% versus −4.8% for Fluor).

Ferrovial keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.2% compared with −12.8% at Fluor.

Fluor scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 5 for Ferrovial), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFERFLR
Size and price
Market cap–$6.3B
Share price$55.29$46.86
Change, 1 year−12.3%−5.0%
Change, 5 years62.4%103%
Beta (5Y)0.461.08
Employees23K–
StockData Score
Total score57 (better)
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score34 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–0.4×
P/B–2.3×
FCF yield–−5.3%
Fair value–$74.61
Margin of safety–37.2%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)5.2% (better)−4.8%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–−0.36%
Net income growth (TTM)−72.6% (better)−148%
EPS growth (TTM)−72.3%–
Profitability
Gross margin–−0.80%
Operating margin–−1.4%
Net margin9.2% (better)−12.8%
FCF margin–−2.1%
Return on equity14.8% (better)−46.2%
Return on invested capital–−7.9%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.18 (better)0.40
Net debt / EBITDA−2.05–
Interest coverage–−5.0×
Current ratio1.131.80 (better)
Altman Z-score–3.71
Piotroski F-score5 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–20.3%
Shareholder yield–20.3%
Ownership
Held by institutions33.5%97.1%
Held by insiders22.1%1.8%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$4.0M
Superinvestors holding12 (better)
Short interest, % of float–8.2%

Go deeper

Other comparisons

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.