FedEx vs United Parcel Service
FDX and UPS side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FDX and UPS compare
United Parcel Service is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as FedEx ($92.1B against $72.8B).
On earnings, FedEx is cheaper: it trades at 16.6× trailing earnings, against 20.1× for United Parcel Service.
FedEx grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.7% versus −0.42% for United Parcel Service).
United Parcel Service keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.1% compared with 4.7% at FedEx.
Both pay dividends: FedEx yields 1.7% and United Parcel Service 6.1%.
United Parcel Service scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 10 for FedEx), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FDX | UPS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $72.8B | $92.1B |
| Share price | $307.82 | $108.25 |
| Change, 1 year | 23.4% | 11.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 26.8% | −48.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.97 | 0.88 |
| Employees | 452K | 10K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 16.6× (better) | 20.1× |
| P/S | 0.8× (better) | 1.0× |
| P/B | 2.3× (better) | 6.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.7× (better) | 11.8× |
| P/FCF | 14.2× (better) | 16.9× |
| PEG | 2.67 | – |
| FCF yield | 7.0% (better) | 5.9% |
| Fair value | $277.79 | $119.04 |
| Margin of safety | −10.8% | 9.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.7% (better) | −0.42% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 2.4% (better) | 0.94% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 8.3% (better) | −20.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 10.4% (better) | −19.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −0.94% | 33.6% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 5.8% | 7.3% (better) |
| Net margin | 4.7% | 5.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.4% | 6.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 14.8% | 29.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 9.6% | 14.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.81 (better) | 1.63 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.26 (better) | 2.09 |
| Interest coverage | – | 6.0× |
| Current ratio | 1.48 (better) | 1.18 |
| Altman Z-score | 2.53 | 2.96 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.7% | 6.1% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 31.0% | 118% |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 17.4% | – |
| Buyback yield | 1.1% (better) | −0.13% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.8% | 5.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 80.7% | 62.8% |
| Held by insiders | 8.5% | 0.06% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$20.2M | −$2.7M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.5% | 3.3% |
Go deeper
- FDX stock overview
- FDX income statement
- FDX valuation and score
- UPS stock overview
- UPS income statement
- UPS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.