StockData

4D Molecular Therapeutics vs Regenxbio

FDMT and RGNX side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FDMT and RGNX compare

4D Molecular Therapeutics is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as Regenxbio ($938M against $559M).

4D Molecular Therapeutics grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (278712% versus 12.0% for Regenxbio).

Regenxbio keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −113% compared with −195% at 4D Molecular Therapeutics.

4D Molecular Therapeutics scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 4 for Regenxbio), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFDMTRGNX
Size and price
Market cap$938M$559M
Share price$12.99$8.47
Change, 1 year27.7%−23.1%
Change, 5 years−43.7%−74.7%
Beta (5Y)1.351.79
Employees196371
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)4
Valuation score00
Growth score22
Performance score2 (better)1
Health score3 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S10.2×3.2× (better)
P/B2.3× (better)7.8×
FCF yield–−44.7%
Fair value$12.76–
Margin of safety−1.8%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)278712% (better)12.0%
Revenue growth, 5Y average44.3% (better)2.0%
Profitability
Operating margin−214%−94.1% (better)
Net margin−195%−113% (better)
FCF margin–−143%
Return on equity−43.3% (better)−138%
Return on invested capital−161%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.05–
Interest coverage–−3.9×
Current ratio8.03 (better)2.86
Altman Z-score3.87 (better)−3.73
Piotroski F-score44
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions80.5%64.2%
Held by insiders2.1%7.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$5.3M$9.6K (better)
Short interest, % of float15.4%16.7%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.