Focus Universal vs Quantum-Si
FCUV and QSI side by side, both in laboratory apparatus and analytical, optical, measuring, and controlling instruments. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FCUV and QSI compare
Quantum-Si is the larger company, worth 130 times as much as Focus Universal ($278M against $2.1M).
Focus Universal grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (294% versus −60.2% for Quantum-Si).
Focus Universal keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −329% compared with −6730% at Quantum-Si.
Focus Universal scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 7 for Quantum-Si), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FCUV | QSI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.1M | $278M |
| Share price | $3.05 | $1.27 |
| Change, 1 year | −97.9% | −20.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −99.9% | −83.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.16 | 2.70 |
| Employees | 37 | 138 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 1.4× (better) | 220× |
| P/B | 0.2× (better) | 1.7× |
| FCF yield | – | −29.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 294% (better) | −60.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −31.4% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 34.9% |
| Operating margin | −319% (better) | −7474% |
| Net margin | −329% (better) | −6730% |
| FCF margin | – | −6431% |
| Return on equity | −92.8% | −43.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −130% (better) | −965% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 4.91 | 9.64 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −2.53 | 5.87 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 27.9% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 27.9% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 4.7% | 24.2% |
| Held by insiders | – | 20.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $69.7K |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 7.3% |
Go deeper
- FCUV stock overview
- FCUV income statement
- FCUV valuation and score
- QSI stock overview
- QSI income statement
- QSI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.