StockData

Focus Universal vs Phaos Technology Holdings (Cayman)

FCUV and POAS side by side, both in laboratory apparatus and analytical, optical, measuring, and controlling instruments. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FCUV and POAS compare

Focus Universal grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (294% versus −21.2% for Phaos Technology Holdings (Cayman)).

Focus Universal keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −329% compared with −4662% at Phaos Technology Holdings (Cayman).

Focus Universal scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 2 for Phaos Technology Holdings (Cayman)), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFCUVPOAS
Size and price
Market cap$2.1M–
Share price$3.00$3.01
Change, 1 year−97.9%–
Change, 5 years−99.9%–
Beta (5Y)1.16–
Employees3710
StockData Score
Total score8 (better)2
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score5 (better)2
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S1.4×–
P/B0.2×–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)294% (better)−21.2%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−31.4%–
Profitability
Gross margin–13.1%
Operating margin−319% (better)−4707%
Net margin−329% (better)−4662%
FCF margin–−8285%
Return on equity−92.8% (better)−369%
Return on invested capital−130% (better)−370%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.01 (better)
Interest coverage–−1203.1×
Current ratio4.915.11 (better)
Altman Z-score−2.53–
Piotroski F-score34 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield28.4%–
Shareholder yield28.4%–
Ownership
Held by institutions4.7%–
Held by insiders–0.00%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.