FTI Consulting vs V2X
FCN and VVX side by side, both in management and public relations services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FCN and VVX compare
FTI Consulting is the larger company, worth 2.2 times as much as V2X ($5.5B against $2.5B).
On earnings, FTI Consulting is cheaper: it trades at 25.3× trailing earnings, against 25.6× for V2X.
V2X grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.2% versus 7.8% for FTI Consulting).
FTI Consulting keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.9% compared with 2.0% at V2X.
FTI Consulting scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 11 for V2X), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FCN | VVX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.5B | $2.5B |
| Share price | $202.81 | $80.28 |
| Change, 1 year | 22.6% | 44.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 33.3% | 67.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.12 | 0.86 |
| Employees | 8,118 | 16K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 11 |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 25.3× (better) | 25.6× |
| P/S | 1.4× | 0.5× (better) |
| P/B | 4.2× | 2.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.7× (better) | 15.8× |
| P/FCF | 15.6× (better) | 15.8× |
| PEG | 3.25 | – |
| FCF yield | 6.4% (better) | 6.3% |
| Fair value | $172.08 | $73.71 |
| Margin of safety | −17.9% | −8.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.8% | 13.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.0% | 26.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −12.3% | 23.8% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 2.0% | 25.6% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 7.8% (better) | −4.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 32.2% (better) | 8.5% |
| Operating margin | 8.8% (better) | 4.2% |
| Net margin | 5.9% (better) | 2.0% |
| FCF margin | 8.9% (better) | 3.2% |
| Return on equity | 15.2% (better) | 8.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 12.4% (better) | 8.2% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.64 (better) | 0.90 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.90 (better) | 3.77 |
| Interest coverage | 9.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.72 (better) | 1.36 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.85 (better) | 2.81 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 12.5% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 12.5% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 112% | 99.8% |
| Held by insiders | 2.5% | 60.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$342K (better) | −$240M |
| Short interest, % of float | 9.9% | 17.0% |
Go deeper
- FCN stock overview
- FCN income statement
- FCN valuation and score
- VVX stock overview
- VVX income statement
- VVX valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.