Fitness Champs vs Xponential Fitness
FCHL and XPOF side by side, both in miscellaneous amusement and recreation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FCHL and XPOF compare
Xponential Fitness grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.2% versus −1.6% for Fitness Champs).
Fitness Champs keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −32.9% compared with −300% at Xponential Fitness.
Xponential Fitness scores higher on the StockData Score (3 against 2 for Fitness Champs), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FCHL | XPOF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $236M |
| Share price | $0.729 | $4.79 |
| Change, 1 year | −99.6% | −25.2% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −78.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.88 | 1.41 |
| Employees | – | 340 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | – | 21.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 15.8× |
| FCF yield | – | −5.2% |
| Fair value | – | $3.46 |
| Margin of safety | – | −38.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.6% | 3.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 55.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −894% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −775% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 27.3% | – |
| Operating margin | −35.5% | 303% (better) |
| Net margin | −32.9% (better) | −300% |
| FCF margin | 14.8% (better) | −109% |
| Return on equity | −108% | – |
| Return on invested capital | – | 21.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 11.46 |
| Interest coverage | −81.8× | 0.6× (better) |
| Current ratio | 3.95 (better) | 0.69 |
| Altman Z-score | – | −2.88 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | – | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 69.6% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 68.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$22.7K | $964K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 72.6% |
Go deeper
- FCHL stock overview
- FCHL income statement
- FCHL valuation and score
- XPOF stock overview
- XPOF income statement
- XPOF valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.