StockData

Fitness Champs vs Powerus

FCHL and PUSA side by side, both in miscellaneous amusement and recreation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How FCHL and PUSA compare

Powerus grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.1% versus −1.6% for Fitness Champs).

Fitness Champs keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −32.9% compared with −154% at Powerus.

Powerus scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 2 for Fitness Champs), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricFCHLPUSA
Size and price
Market cap–$36.1M
Share price$0.744$1.34
Change, 1 year−99.5%−73.8%
Beta (5Y)0.972.13
Employees–47
StockData Score
Total score27 (better)
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score00
Health score16 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–11.2×
P/B–0.8×
FCF yield–−6.6%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−1.6%6.1% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−894%–
EPS growth (TTM)−775%–
Profitability
Gross margin27.3%–
Operating margin−35.5% (better)−204%
Net margin−32.9% (better)−154%
FCF margin14.8% (better)−74.0%
Return on equity−108%−17.2% (better)
Return on invested capital–−143%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Interest coverage−81.8×–
Current ratio3.9552.40 (better)
Altman Z-score–15.42
Piotroski F-score4 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–−22.4%
Shareholder yield–−22.4%
Ownership
Held by institutions–8.8%
Held by insiders0.00%–
Insider net buying, 12 months−$22.7K–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.