Fitness Champs vs Kustom Entertainment
FCHL and KUST side by side, both in miscellaneous amusement and recreation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FCHL and KUST compare
Fitness Champs scores higher on the StockData Score (2 against 0 for Kustom Entertainment), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FCHL | KUST |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $20.8M |
| Share price | $0.744 | $3.20 |
| Change, 1 year | −99.5% | −98.6% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −100% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.97 | 1.51 |
| Employees | – | 30 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| FCF yield | – | −41.6% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.6% | – |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | −12.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −894% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −775% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 27.3% | – |
| Operating margin | −35.5% | – |
| Net margin | −32.9% | – |
| FCF margin | 14.8% | – |
| Return on equity | −108% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | −81.8× | −9.9× (better) |
| Current ratio | 3.95 (better) | 0.80 |
| Altman Z-score | – | −14.27 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | – | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 0.16% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 29.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$22.7K (better) | −$50.1K |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 2.2% |
Go deeper
- FCHL stock overview
- FCHL income statement
- FCHL valuation and score
- KUST stock overview
- KUST income statement
- KUST valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.