Fitness Champs vs Golden Heaven
FCHL and GDHG side by side, both in miscellaneous amusement and recreation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FCHL and GDHG compare
Fitness Champs grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−1.6% versus −31.5% for Golden Heaven).
Fitness Champs keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −32.9% compared with −56.2% at Golden Heaven.
Golden Heaven scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 2 for Fitness Champs), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FCHL | GDHG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $0.744 | $0.825 |
| Change, 1 year | −99.5% | −81.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.97 | 1.13 |
| Employees | – | 86 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −1.6% (better) | −31.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −894% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −775% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 27.3% | 50.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | −35.5% (better) | −44.5% |
| Net margin | −32.9% (better) | −56.2% |
| FCF margin | 14.8% | – |
| Return on equity | −108% | −5.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | −11.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −81.8× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.95 (better) | 3.05 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$22.7K | – |
Go deeper
- FCHL stock overview
- FCHL income statement
- FCHL valuation and score
- GDHG stock overview
- GDHG income statement
- GDHG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.