Forcendra vs Infobird
FCDH and IFBD side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FCDH and IFBD compare
Infobird grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (506% versus −8.8% for Forcendra).
Forcendra keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −114% compared with −616% at Infobird.
Infobird scores higher on the StockData Score (3 against 2 for Forcendra), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FCDH | IFBD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $0.602 | $1.43 |
| Change, 1 year | −95.7% | 20.2% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −100.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.55 | 1.15 |
| Employees | 42 | 11 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −8.8% | 506% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | −9.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 23.7% | 29.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | −85.4% (better) | −607% |
| Net margin | −114% (better) | −616% |
| FCF margin | −46.9% | – |
| Return on equity | −318% | −154% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −277% | −140% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | −39.4× (better) | −104.8× |
| Current ratio | 1.47 (better) | 1.30 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 0.05% | – |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 1.0% |
Go deeper
- FCDH stock overview
- FCDH income statement
- FCDH valuation and score
- IFBD stock overview
- IFBD income statement
- IFBD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.