Franklin Covey vs Hackett
FC and HCKT side by side, both in management and public relations services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FC and HCKT compare
Hackett is the larger company, worth 2.0 times as much as Franklin Covey ($334M against $171M).
On earnings, Hackett is cheaper: it trades at 19.2× trailing earnings, against 94.4× for Franklin Covey.
Franklin Covey grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−6.1% versus −8.2% for Hackett).
Hackett keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.3% compared with 0.83% at Franklin Covey.
Hackett pays a dividend yielding 3.6%; Franklin Covey does not pay one.
Hackett scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 8 for Franklin Covey), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FC | HCKT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $171M | $334M |
| Share price | $15.10 | $13.42 |
| Change, 1 year | 1.3% | −27.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −68.5% | −38.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.98 | 0.89 |
| Employees | 1,120 | 1,503 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 94.4× | 19.2× (better) |
| P/S | 0.6× (better) | 1.2× |
| P/B | 4.0× (better) | 4.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 24.6× | 12.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 8.8× (better) | 16.0× |
| FCF yield | 11.3% (better) | 6.2% |
| Fair value | $17.85 | $14.41 |
| Margin of safety | 15.4% (better) | 6.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −6.1% (better) | −8.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.1% (better) | 5.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −79.5% | 63.4% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −79.7% | 84.2% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 22.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 75.2% (better) | 41.0% |
| Operating margin | 2.4% | 11.7% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.83% | 6.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 7.3% (better) | 7.3% |
| Return on equity | 4.0% | 20.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 10.2% | 14.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 1.21 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 2.21 |
| Interest coverage | 19.1× (better) | 8.1× |
| Current ratio | 0.66 | 2.13 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.68 | 4.02 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 3.6% |
| Payout ratio | – | 68.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 4.8% |
| Buyback yield | 18.5% (better) | 15.0% |
| Shareholder yield | 18.5% | 18.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 72.6% | 84.5% |
| Held by insiders | 44.7% | 12.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $0 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 13.3% | 5.6% |
Go deeper
- FC stock overview
- FC income statement
- FC valuation and score
- HCKT stock overview
- HCKT income statement
- HCKT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.