Falcon's Beyond Global vs NIP
FBYD and NIPG side by side, both in miscellaneous amusement and recreation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FBYD and NIPG compare
Falcon's Beyond Global grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (157% versus 48.4% for NIP).
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FBYD | NIPG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $639M | – |
| Share price | $5.27 | $3.30 |
| Change, 1 year | −56.6% | −92.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.40 | 0.99 |
| Employees | 243 | 247 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 2 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 25.7× | – |
| P/B | 55.3× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 491× | – |
| FCF yield | −0.36% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 157% (better) | 48.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | −1.2% |
| Operating margin | 3.3% (better) | −197% |
| Net margin | – | −188% |
| FCF margin | −9.2% (better) | −12.6% |
| Return on equity | – | −147% |
| Return on invested capital | 2.8% (better) | −110% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.39 | 0.49 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 10.46 | – |
| Interest coverage | 1.0× (better) | −111.1× |
| Current ratio | 0.68 | 0.87 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 9.27 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 3.9% | 0.01% |
| Held by insiders | 24.0% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$442K |
Go deeper
- FBYD stock overview
- FBYD income statement
- FBYD valuation and score
- NIPG stock overview
- NIPG income statement
- NIPG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.