Franklin BSP Realty Trust vs PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust
FBRT and PMT side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FBRT and PMT compare
PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Franklin BSP Realty Trust ($650M against $465M).
Franklin BSP Realty Trust grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.9% versus 14.6% for PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust).
PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 47.8% compared with 6.4% at Franklin BSP Realty Trust.
Both pay dividends: Franklin BSP Realty Trust yields 15.5% and PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust 21.5%.
PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 12 for Franklin BSP Realty Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FBRT | PMT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $465M | $650M |
| Share price | $6.15 | $7.45 |
| Change, 1 year | −38.6% | −39.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −62.9% | −59.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.75 | 0.84 |
| Employees | 223 | 7 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 5.2× |
| P/S | 1.6× (better) | 1.9× |
| P/B | 0.3× (better) | 0.4× |
| Fair value | $20.94 | $25.69 |
| Margin of safety | 70.6% | 71.0% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 15.9% (better) | 14.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 18.1% (better) | −8.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −80.5% | 58.0% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −113% | 97.2% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −6.6% | 29.7% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 6.4% | 47.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 1.3% | 8.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | −0.00 (better) | −0.00 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 15.5% | 21.5% (better) |
| Payout ratio | 621% | 83.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 1.8% | – |
| Buyback yield | 28.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 43.6% (better) | 21.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 62.9% | 72.1% |
| Held by insiders | 2.7% | 1.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.6M (better) | −$64.4K |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.5% | – |
Go deeper
- FBRT stock overview
- FBRT income statement
- FBRT valuation and score
- PMT stock overview
- PMT income statement
- PMT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.