Fortune Brands Innovations vs UFP Industries
FBIN and UFPI side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FBIN and UFPI compare
Fortune Brands Innovations is the larger company, worth 1.3 times as much as UFP Industries ($5.9B against $4.4B).
UFP Industries grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−0.71% versus −3.0% for Fortune Brands Innovations).
Both pay dividends: Fortune Brands Innovations yields 2.1% and UFP Industries 1.8%.
UFP Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 6 for Fortune Brands Innovations), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FBIN | UFPI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.9B | $4.4B |
| Share price | $49.17 | $80.11 |
| Change, 1 year | 0.99% | −12.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −54.2% | −10.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.27 | 0.97 |
| Employees | 10K | 14K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 19.4× |
| P/S | 1.3× | 0.7× (better) |
| P/B | – | 1.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 34.0× | 13.3× (better) |
| P/FCF | 10.6× (better) | 22.7× |
| FCF yield | 9.4% (better) | 4.4% |
| Fair value | $23.70 | $85.09 |
| Margin of safety | −107% | 5.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.0% | −0.71% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.3% (better) | 4.2% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −28.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −23.8% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −8.9% | 4.6% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 46.0% (better) | 15.4% |
| Operating margin | 5.4% (better) | 4.6% |
| Net margin | – | 3.6% |
| FCF margin | 12.7% (better) | 3.0% |
| Return on equity | – | 7.5% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 8.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.08 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 8.85 (better) | −1.65 |
| Interest coverage | 2.2× | 29.3× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.83 | 3.86 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.64 | 5.58 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.1% (better) | 1.8% |
| Payout ratio | – | 34.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 | 7 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 0.60% | 22.9% (better) |
| Buyback yield | 1.6% | 7.5% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 3.7% | 9.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 106% | 88.5% |
| Held by insiders | 8.9% | 2.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $30.6M (better) | −$1.0M |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.4% | 4.2% |
Go deeper
- FBIN stock overview
- FBIN income statement
- FBIN valuation and score
- UFPI stock overview
- UFPI income statement
- UFPI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.