FBS Global vs Springview
FBGL and SPHL side by side, both in building construction general contractors and operative builders. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FBGL and SPHL compare
FBS Global grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (86.8% versus −11.4% for Springview).
FBS Global keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −7.9% compared with −30.1% at Springview.
FBS Global scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 3 for Springview), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FBGL | SPHL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $2.36 | $2.27 |
| Change, 1 year | −57.1% | −39.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.55 | −0.09 |
| Employees | 74 | 73 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 86.8% (better) | −11.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 10.2% | 13.7% (better) |
| Operating margin | −7.5% (better) | −31.8% |
| Net margin | −7.9% (better) | −30.1% |
| FCF margin | −16.2% | – |
| Return on equity | −23.6% (better) | −38.6% |
| Return on invested capital | −27.3% (better) | −39.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.01 (better) | 0.14 |
| Interest coverage | −133.5× | −44.9× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.60 | 3.53 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by insiders | 69.4% | 70.4% |
Go deeper
- FBGL stock overview
- FBGL income statement
- FBGL valuation and score
- SPHL stock overview
- SPHL income statement
- SPHL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.