FBS Global vs Magnitude International
FBGL and MAGH side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FBGL and MAGH compare
FBS Global grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (86.8% versus 24.0% for Magnitude International).
FBS Global keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −7.9% compared with −12.2% at Magnitude International.
FBS Global scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 2 for Magnitude International), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FBGL | MAGH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $2.36 | $6.76 |
| Change, 1 year | −57.1% | 386% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.55 | −0.50 |
| Employees | 74 | 107 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 86.8% (better) | 24.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −5528% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −7100% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 10.2% | 10.5% (better) |
| Operating margin | −7.5% (better) | −11.6% |
| Net margin | −7.9% (better) | −12.2% |
| FCF margin | −16.2% | −10.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | −23.6% (better) | −83.9% |
| Return on invested capital | −27.3% (better) | −43.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.01 (better) | 0.41 |
| Interest coverage | −133.5× | −15.5× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.60 | 1.81 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by insiders | 69.4% | 0.00% |
Go deeper
- FBGL stock overview
- FBGL income statement
- FBGL valuation and score
- MAGH stock overview
- MAGH income statement
- MAGH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.