FBS Global vs Masonglory
FBGL and FFTT side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FBGL and FFTT compare
FBS Global grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (86.8% versus 1.0% for Masonglory).
FBS Global keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −7.9% compared with −34.0% at Masonglory.
Masonglory scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 5 for FBS Global), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FBGL | FFTT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $2.36 | $3.83 |
| Change, 1 year | −57.1% | −67.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.55 | 2.78 |
| Employees | 74 | 11 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 86.8% (better) | 1.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −727% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 460% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 10.2% (better) | 4.4% |
| Operating margin | −7.5% (better) | −33.2% |
| Net margin | −7.9% (better) | −34.0% |
| FCF margin | −16.2% (better) | −24.6% |
| Return on equity | −23.6% (better) | −135% |
| Return on invested capital | −27.3% (better) | −135% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.01 (better) | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | −133.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.60 | 3.13 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by insiders | 69.4% | 49.6% |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 0.33% |
Go deeper
- FBGL stock overview
- FBGL income statement
- FBGL valuation and score
- FFTT stock overview
- FFTT income statement
- FFTT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.