Fatpipe vs Rank One Computing
FATN and ROC side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FATN and ROC compare
Fatpipe and Rank One Computing are about the same size, with market caps of $68.7M and $67.7M.
Fatpipe grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (31.8% versus 23.9% for Rank One Computing).
Fatpipe scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 3 for Rank One Computing), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FATN | ROC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $68.7M | $67.7M |
| Share price | $4.86 | $3.55 |
| Change, 1 year | 61.5% | – |
| Change, 5 years | – | −94.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.74 | 0.30 |
| Employees | 172 | 16 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 10.3× | – |
| P/S | 2.5× (better) | 4.0× |
| P/B | 2.5× (better) | 3.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 14.4× | – |
| Fair value | $9.46 | $2.78 |
| Margin of safety | 48.6% (better) | −27.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 31.8% (better) | 23.9% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 1467% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 69.5% | 77.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 15.8% (better) | −11.8% |
| Net margin | – | −15.8% |
| Return on equity | – | −27.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 21.5% (better) | −42.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.02 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.58 | – |
| Interest coverage | 10.7× (better) | −24.7× |
| Current ratio | 5.13 | 5.38 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 7.72 | 10.50 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | −22.3% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% (better) | −22.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 3.5% | 8.8% |
| Held by insiders | 47.0% | 79.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $29.0K (better) | −$4.1M |
| Short interest, % of float | 1.0% | 0.82% |
Go deeper
- FATN stock overview
- FATN income statement
- FATN valuation and score
- ROC stock overview
- ROC income statement
- ROC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.