Diamondback Energy vs Occidental Petroleum
FANG and OXY side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How FANG and OXY compare
Diamondback Energy and Occidental Petroleum are about the same size, with market caps of $59.4B and $64.0B.
On earnings, Occidental Petroleum is cheaper: it trades at 9.9× trailing earnings, against 41.1× for Diamondback Energy.
Diamondback Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (21.4% versus 7.3% for Occidental Petroleum).
Both pay dividends: Diamondback Energy yields 2.0% and Occidental Petroleum 1.6%.
Occidental Petroleum scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 9 for Diamondback Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | FANG | OXY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $59.4B | $64.0B |
| Share price | $212.08 | $64.00 |
| Change, 1 year | 47.7% | 57.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 86.4% | 91.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.66 | 0.40 |
| Employees | 1,762 | 6,793 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 41.1× | 9.9× (better) |
| P/S | 3.5× | 3.0× (better) |
| P/B | 1.6× | 1.5× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 12.3× | 5.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 13.3× |
| FCF yield | – | 7.5% |
| Fair value | $123.05 | $73.13 |
| Margin of safety | −72.3% | 12.5% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 21.4% (better) | 7.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 39.8% (better) | 3.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −61.8% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −63.3% | 278% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 6.3% | – |
| Net margin | 8.6% | – |
| FCF margin | – | 22.1% |
| Return on equity | 3.8% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 1.7% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.33 | 0.33 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.92 | 0.76 (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.47 | 1.41 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.72 | 1.81 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.0% (better) | 1.6% |
| Payout ratio | 80.4% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 21.3% (better) | 3.2% |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% (better) | −0.33% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.0% (better) | 1.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 72.0% | 83.6% |
| Held by insiders | 23.8% | 0.38% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$8.9B | $445K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.4% | 2.2% |
Go deeper
- FANG stock overview
- FANG income statement
- FANG valuation and score
- OXY stock overview
- OXY income statement
- OXY valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.