StockData

EyePoint vs Quantum-Si

EYPT and QSI side by side, both in laboratory apparatus and analytical, optical, measuring, and controlling instruments. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How EYPT and QSI compare

Quantum-Si is the larger company, worth 9.5 times as much as EyePoint ($252M against $26.4M).

Quantum-Si grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−60.2% versus −93.9% for EyePoint).

Quantum-Si keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −6730% compared with −13281% at EyePoint.

Quantum-Si scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 6 for EyePoint), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricEYPTQSI
Size and price
Market cap$26.4M$252M
Share price$0.306$1.15
Change, 1 year−97.4%−24.3%
Change, 5 years−98.2%−84.8%
Beta (5Y)1.712.68
Employees214138
StockData Score
Total score67 (better)
Valuation score11
Growth score00
Performance score00
Health score56 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S10.2× (better)199×
P/B0.2× (better)1.6×
FCF yield−1134%−32.3% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−93.9%−60.2% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−1.8%–
Profitability
Gross margin–34.9%
Operating margin−13642%−7474% (better)
Net margin−13281%−6730% (better)
FCF margin−11599%−6431% (better)
Return on equity−222%−43.1% (better)
Return on invested capital–−965%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.00
Current ratio3.309.64 (better)
Altman Z-score−17.694.62 (better)
Piotroski F-score22
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions108%24.2%
Held by insiders0.96%20.5%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$1.9M$69.7K (better)
Short interest, % of float12.9%7.3%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.